poisar

Stocks · News reference

Bernstein Maintains Market Perform on General Dynamics, Lowers Price Target to $407

BenzingaBenzinga Newsdesk

Bernstein analyst Douglas Harned maintains General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) with a Market Perform and lowers the price target from $421 to $407.

Reference Details

Connected Markets

Poisar stores the source's headline, summary and market tags for reference. Reporting and full article text remain with the original publisher.

Source
benzinga
Observed
Checked
Cadence
Captured once, then retained as an archive reference
Status
fresh

Keep reading

  1. The Motley FoolBrendan Coffey

    Boeing vs. Lockheed Martin: Which Essential U.S. Aerospace Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?

    The article compares Boeing and Lockheed Martin as aerospace investment options for 2026. Boeing is undergoing a turnaround with strong commercial aviation demand and record backlogs, but faces operational challenges, high debt (10.0x debt-to-equity), and negative free cash flow. Lockheed Martin offers stability with steady profitability, lower leverage (3.2x debt-to-equity), strong free cash flow ($6.9B), and long-term F-35 program revenue visibility. The author recommends Lockheed Martin as the better value investment due to its cheaper valuation multiples (17.3x forward P/E vs. Boeing's 49.7x) and fortress-like business model.

  2. Zacks Investment ResearchNa

    Can Stryker Vehicle Demand Support General Dynamics' Growth?

    General Dynamics received a $49.3 million contract modification for Double V-Hull A1 Stryker vehicles, bringing cumulative contract value to $278.9 million through December 2028. The award reflects continued U.S. Army demand for modern armored vehicles and provides revenue visibility for GD's Land Systems business, with potential for follow-on orders and lifecycle support.

  3. Globenewswire IncUsa News Group

    American Shipyards Are Backlogged and Washington Is Buying Software

    The U.S. Navy awarded a $448 million contract in December 2025 to accelerate AI and autonomy adoption across the submarine industrial base, treating shipyard capacity constraints as a data problem. Pilot results showed dramatic efficiency gains: submarine schedule planning reduced from 160 hours to under 10 minutes at General Dynamics Electric Boat, and material review times cut from weeks to under one hour at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. The initiative aims to extract more output from existing yards rather than build new capacity, with potential expansion to surface shipbuilding.