poisar

Stocks · News reference

NuScale Power shares are trading lower after UBS downgraded its rating on the stock from Neutral to Sell and lowered its price target from $10 to $6.

Benzinga Newsdesk
More stocks newsConnected markets

Reference Details

Connected Markets

Poisar stores the source's headline, summary and market tags for reference. Reporting and full article text remain with the original publisher.

SMR
Source
benzinga
Observed
Checked
Cadence
Captured once, then retained as an archive reference
Status
fresh

Keep reading

  1. Courtney Carlsen

    NuScale Power Just Solved a Major Engineering Hurdle: Is the Stock a Buy?

    NuScale Power achieved a major engineering breakthrough by successfully fabricating boron-oxide pellets for its passive emergency cooling system in collaboration with MilleniTEK. This milestone moves the company closer to commercial deployment of its small modular reactors, though significant hurdles remain. The company is pursuing major deals, including a potential agreement with the Tennessee Valley Authority for up to 72 SMRs, but operational deployment isn't expected until the 2030s, making it a high-risk investment for aggressive long-term investors.

    SMR
  2. Ryan Vanzo

    Europe Bets Big on Small Modular Reactors. Here's How NuScale Power and Oklo Will Benefit.

    The European Investment Bank announced a €40 million loan to Finnish SMR developer Steady Energy, marking the first in a planned pipeline of SMR investments. This government support is expected to benefit SMR companies like NuScale Power and Oklo by increasing commercialization proof points and helping convert their customer pipelines into revenue-generating projects, though meaningful results could take years.

    SMROKLO
  3. Steven Porrello

    A Word of Caution on NuScale Power Before You Buy the Dip

    A University of Colorado Boulder study estimates NuScale's small modular reactor operating costs at over $93 per MWh, significantly higher than historical electricity market prices of $42-45 per MWh. The research suggests that even if reactors were built for free, they might not pay for themselves over their 60-year lifespan. With no commercial reactors deployed yet and a previous project cost ballooning from $4.2 billion to $9.3 billion before cancellation, investors should exercise caution until NuScale demonstrates it can build and operate reactors cost-effectively.

    SMROKLO
  4. Ben Gran

    NuScale Power Is Closing In on a Deal That Could Transform the Small Modular Reactor Industry

    NuScale Power is progressing toward a potentially transformative deal with the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and ENTRA1 Energy to develop 6 gigawatts of nuclear power generation capacity. However, the agreement remains non-binding without a final power purchase agreement, and the company has generated minimal revenue ($75,000 in Q2) while its stock has declined 75% over the past year. NuScale needs to finalize money-making deals soon despite having $1.9 billion in cash reserves.

    SMR